Sunday, September 26, 2010
[Sharing] Full Text: Progress in China's Human Rights in 2009 - China Political & Defence Forum - Global Times Forum - Discuss China, Discuss the world
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Interview with RCI on DPRK
Thursday, September 23, 2010
AFP: EU to press China on rights at summit: trade chief
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Vaclav Havel Op-Ed on Liu Xiaobo
Tel.: +1-905-228-2323
FAX: +1-209-231-4087
MSN, Yahoo, Google: cburton001; Skype: cburton002
Hushmail: Burton
http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~cburton
Monday, September 20, 2010
Chinese Report on DPRK Worker's Party Congress Delay
金正银竟然拒做接班人,朝鲜党大会推迟
联合早报
尽管朝鲜党大会推迟召开众说纷纭,但美国RFA称,朝鲜在安排金正银接班的过程中可能出现意见分歧,这也许是他们推迟大会的真正原因。
该电台昨日引述中国消息人士的话说:"朝鲜原本预备本月初在平壤举行党大会,推举金正银为接班人。朝鲜内部对此可能出现了意见分歧。"
该消息人士还说:"朝方可能认为,在朝鲜经济低迷不振的情况下,推举80后的年轻人为接班人感到负担。
"而且在由金正银主导的货币改革失败、老百姓深受洪涝灾害的情况下,朝鲜当局可能担心得不到老百姓支持,因此推迟了会期。"
韩国对朝广播媒体"开放的朝鲜广播"也说,党大会推迟的最大原因是金正日的健康问题,接下来是朝鲜还没决定,金正银上台后,要采取多大范围的改革开放路线, 因为朝鲜内部对改革开放政策出现意见分歧,朝鲜可能在商讨这方面的问题。
据报道,朝鲜公布将于9月上旬举行党代会的时间是6月份,但金正日8月底访华与中共国家主席胡锦涛会晤。当时,胡锦涛向金正日表示,希望朝鲜推行中国式改革开放政策。因此,朝鲜原来制定的政策路线出现了变化,朝鲜有可能对改革开放的范围进行协调之中。
东国大学教授金榕炫说:"金正日原本只想推行劳动党主导的特区开发政策,但中方的要求力度很高,所以有些惊慌失措。要在党代会上发表的政策路线可能尚未整理完毕。"
出身朝鲜军人的韩国民间团体"朝鲜人民解放战线"引述消息人士的话说,金正银自己对成为接班人的问题感到很大压力,拒绝在此次党大会上成为接班人。
Tel.: +1-905-228-2323
FAX: +1-209-231-4087
MSN, Yahoo, Google: cburton001; Skype: cburton002
Hushmail: Burton
http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~cburton
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Still no word from N. Korea about conference delay, but much speculation
Q&A: Where is the China-Japan sea dispute headed? | Reuters
Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Diplomats don't have needed skills: Harder - Northern News - Ontario, CA
Monday, September 06, 2010
Response to a Ph.D. Student on My China-Korea Op-Ed
My interpretation of the China-Korea dynamic is bascially shared by a number of my colleagues in Communist Party policy research institutes in China. I think that their leaders are more or less at wit's end with Kim Jong-il. Over the years he has come to China by train a number of times. They show him the Shanghai stock market, the special economic zone at Shenzhen, new housing estates, etc. etc. He always expresses enthusiasm and agrees with apparently sincerity that the DPRK should also do opening and reform too and then asks for more grain and oil in the meantime. The same pattern has repeated so many times (including at his recent get together with Hu Jintao).
No one thinks anymore that the Kim family regime is actually prepared to undertake opening and reform. After all the example of China suggests that the people in political power when the economic reform program begins are out of power in a matter of a few years. Mao's successor Chairman Hua Guofeng was eased out rather elegantly as the Mao cult was wound down. A similar process in the DPRK would be ideal --- gradual reinterpretation of Juche and re-evaluation of the past (Mao was given the official 70% good/30% bad assessment 5 years after his death).
I don't propose that China should send in the PLA. They know they would likely end up in an Afghanistan-like polarized situation if they did that. I just judge that pervasive popular discontent with the idea of Kim Jong-un taking over would provide an opportunity for China to identify and support a pro-reform element in the military and Party. It is hard for China to play this for two reasons: 1. very strong Korean nationalism/xenophobia; and 2. the effect in China domestically if the DPRK's Stalinist institutions collapsed (because China's political system is based on the same model initiated by Lenin to suit the situation in post-Czarist Russia). But the DPRK leadership does see China as a kind of patriarch, I think, albeit one that they think has gone "soft" over the years. That is why they do China the honour of a ritual presentation of the successor for "approval."
I expect that the ROK would probably go along with China's "assistance" to the DPRK. If the ROK gets involved too early on things could go disastrously in my view.
I would further judge that reunfication of Korea would only come once China abandons Stalinist political institutions itself. I remain confident that that will happen before I retire from Brock.
Sunday, September 05, 2010
Response to a Romanian Friend Who Wrote to Me in Praise of my Op-Ed on North Korea
It really is a commentary on human frailty that Ceaucescu would decide that he should force the Romanian people to refer to him as "the Genius of the Carpathians" and that his family members should become like super privileged socialist nobility. But Romania seems to have been able to put that awful period behind it, thank God. Actually it appears to me that only some people living in democracies believe that democratic institutions are not the best for all peoples. It is hard for them to understand that no nation that has made a transition to democracy ever wants to go back to authoritarian dictatorship. Seems that one needs the experience of living under an oppressive regime to really appreciate how precious democratic freedoms really are.
For an article on how Ceaucescu was inspired to start his own personality cult after a visit to Pyongyang in 1971 see: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1027835/posts
Wait's Over for Political Reform in China _English_Caixin
"(Beijing) - The 30th anniversary of the Shenzhen special economic zone recently reignited debates over China's reform process. In particular, discussions focused on a speech made by Premier Wen Jiabao in Shenzhen a few days before the anniversary in which he said political and economic reform must go hand-in-hand.
Without political reform, Wen said, the nation's economic gains cannot be sustained, and the drive to modernize will fail.
The premier's remarks were not prominently reported in the official press, but they sparked strong reactions at home and abroad, underscoring the depth of citizen angst for political reform."