Shorter version:
https://youtu.be/uJEEx6R-jpM?si=1ZnLrhrMhYu3PsNs
Shorter version:
https://youtu.be/uJEEx6R-jpM?si=1ZnLrhrMhYu3PsNs
After our banishment was posted on a government website, the Chinese Communist Party-controlled newspaper The Global Times reported that we were exiled for offences that included “spreading disinformation” about human-rights violations in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and in Tibet. (PRC official propaganda has recently started to refer to Tibet by its name in romanized Chinese, Xizang, meaning literally “western treasury.” It is politically motivated subterfuge to downplay that Tibet has been the ancestral land of Tibetans since long before the Han Chinese invaded the territory.)
The Chinese official statement reads:
“Canada’s actions are an attempt to use human-rights issues in Xinjiang and Xizang to enhance its international presence and strengthen its influence in global diplomacy and ideological discourse.”
So, unlike my sanctioning by Russia in 2022, China did not ban me because of what I have published in newspapers. It was a response to Canada’s China policy in general.
When I began placing opinion pieces in Canadian newspapers nearly 20 years ago, many Canadians were confident that China could become a responsible stakeholder in world affairs. Canada under Justin Trudeau came close to collaborating with China in international affairs, including transnational crime, even considering an extradition treaty. We also came close to integrating our economies through a free-trade deal.
But, as the commentary articles recount, as China became more powerful economically, it began posing a hostile geostrategic threat to the international rules-based order.
China’s current leadership sees Donald Trump as fulfilling Xi Jinping’s prediction that the United States is a power in decline — that the vacuum created by American nationalism will be filled by China — and that Xi’s “Community of the Common Destiny of Mankind” will become the future global order.
China thus assumes what Mr. Xi considers its rightful role as the dominant global civilization, with Chinese even displacing English as the world’s foremost common language. Under Xi’s vision, Canadians would realize that a political system based on China’s authoritarian model, and on its superior civilization informed by Confucianism, is Canada’s best option for political, economic and social development. Canada would become a subsidiary economy to China’s centre of global industrial production and infrastructure.
Arriving in Britain shortly after the death of Mao, I began learning to speak and read Chinese at Cambridge. As my command of Mandarin continued to grow, I decided I would be better off continuing my studies in China. I applied to the Canada-China Scholars’ Exchange Program, and was accepted to study ancient Chinese philosophy at Fudan University.
I arrived in China at a good moment, historically speaking. After 10 years of fear and distrust during the Cultural Revolution, my cohort at Fudan was the first to be selected based on competitive entrance exams. These would be the most formative and fascinating years of my life.
Life in Building Four dorm meant being in close company with earnest students 24/7, sharing the same space, eating the same food. None of my roommates had ever had contact with any non-Chinese before meeting me, but I was welcomed without reservation to assimilate into their society. In Chinese culture, this means an unbreakable friendship for life and an iron obligation to loyalty. Some of my dorm mates became senior officials in the Communist régime while others emigrated to the U.S., but to this day the bond of our shared past overcomes all.
Mr. Xi contends that China will achieve universal prosperity by 2035 and will be the planet’s undisputed power by 2050, thus rectifying perceived past humiliations of being subordinated by Japan and the west, and realizing Mr. Xi’s vision of a China-led “community of the common destiny of mankind.”
When Mr. Xi’s regime looks at resource-rich Canada, it sees a remote region “under Heaven” rather than a sovereign nation with some inalienable right to control its own territory and domestic affairs.
For China, the message to Canadians is clear: America is the past and China is the future, so we must get on the right track. Canada had better realize the rewards are great for complying with China’s political agenda, including its claim over Taiwan and military expansion in the East and South China Seas. Resistance is futile, and even the slightest opposition will have disastrous consequences for Canada’s economy.
Last month, Beijing’s propaganda mouthpiece, the Global Times, published a Chinese Communist Party statement about the August meeting of the China-Canada Joint Economic and Trade Commission (quietly held in Ottawa, while Parliament was on summer recess). Headlined “China willing to work with Canada to expand trade and economic co-operation: senior Chinese official,” the report says China wants “Canada to take immediate steps to correct its erroneous practices,” and “maintain policy autonomy” (from the United States), and take “constructive approaches and pragmatic actions to manage differences.”
In other words, Canada should ease restrictions on Chinese access to sensitive technologies and natural resources (especially critical minerals) and not expel diplomats whose function is to intimidate Canadians of Hong Kong origin. Based on the Beijing regime’s well-worn track record, China would not agree to do anything different in response to Canada’s concerns.
Curiously, in another speech last week, Xi seemed to suggest China might be turning over a new leaf in international behaviour, promising to “fully, comprehensively, and completely adhere to the universally recognized basic norms governing international relations, including the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and ensure the equal and uniform application of international law and international rules.”
Recognizing the UN Charter and international rules? Is Xi suddenly becoming everything that Trump isn’t? It was a ploy. Both speeches concluded with Xi’s “common destiny of mankind” trope, where China takes its place at the helm of the world.
https://www.ipolitics.ca/2025/08/08/can-canada-work-with-chinas-xi-jinping-for-real-mutual-benefit/
When today’s Xi regime looks at Canada it sees a remote and resource-rich region “under Heaven,” rather than a sovereign nation with some inalienable right to control its own territory and domestic affairs.
Beijing’s message to Canada is clear: America is the past and China is the future, so get on the right track. Canada had better realize the rewards are great for complying with China’s political agenda, including its claim over Taiwan and military expansion in the East and South China Seas. Resistance is futile, and even the slightest opposition will have disastrous consequences for Canada’s economy.
There are increasing signs that Mark Carney’s cabinet, which is anxiously trying to mend our crumbling alliance with the United States, is quietly pursuing a major policy shift in Canada’s relations with China.
Foreign Minister Anita Anand reinforced the notion after meeting with her Asian counterparts in Malaysia in early July. “It is important for us to revisit our policy – not only in the Indo-Pacific but generally speaking – to ensure that we are focusing not only on the values that we have historically adhered to,” she said.
“Foreign policy is an extension of domestic interest and particularly domestic economic interests,” she added. “This is a time when the global economy is under stress.”
When Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met recently in Beijing with Xi Jinping, the Chinese Leader made the standard comment that Western nations dealing with China should “seek common ground while setting aside differences.” Mr. Albanese actually concurred, saying, “That approach has indeed produced very positive benefits for both Australia and for China.”
Unfortunately the “differences” that Mr. Xi talks about result in harms to Canada, not China. For Ottawa, the price of enhanced trade would be dear: Let China mine critical minerals in Canada’s North, give open access to Canadian high tech and dual-use military technologies, abandon implementing a foreign influence transparency registry, accept China’s incursions in the Canadian Arctic, and cease Canada’s modest freedom of navigation exercises in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait. And those are just for starters.
https://www.amazon.ca/dp/0888903715?ref_=cm_sw_r_ffobk_mwn_dp_FQKHSFAQES2Q04RMSCNQ&bestFormat=true&dplnkId=36d939e5-cb58-4621-ae87-ae5063dde7df&dplnkId=2355c8f1-ea7c-49b2-9f40-6062637994d7