Friday, February 27, 2009
My Report on Canada-China Relations In the Eye of the Beholder
Personally I would not characterize my report as: "much of the study's focus is on China's unconstrained spying and Canada's relative naiveté." But different readers focus on different aspects of the document. The subheadings of my report include the following:
Trade and Investment
Immigration and Consular Matters
Development and Human Rights
Political and Economic Relations
Taiwan, Tibet, Uyghur, Mongolian Issues and Falungong Issues
Public Diplomacy
My hope is that people will read the full report (or at least the "Executive Summary," but reading the whole thing would be best).
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Press Release for "A Reassessment of Canada’s Interests in China and Options for Renewal of Canada’s China Policy"
http://www.canadianinternationalcouncil.org/download/aboutus/media/pressrelea/090224burt
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Canada’s approach to China is woefully inadequate
Canadian diplomats not prepared for service in China, lacking basic language skills
TORONTO, ON – February 24, 2009 – Canada’s foreign policy toward China has been falling short of expectations for more than a decade and across a wide range of criteria, states a new paper released today by the Canadian International Council (CIC).
A Reassessment of Canada’s Interests in China and Options for Renewal of Canada’s China Policy, written by Charles Burton, examines Canada’s existing China programming and concludes that it has become less relevant to Chinese conditions and less effective in fulfilling Canada’s interest in China.
Dr. Burton, a CIC research associate and Brock University political scientist who has been seconded to work at Canada’s Embassy in Beijing on two separate occasions, argues that Canada’s prosperity in the global trading environment is at risk if it doesn’t improve its engagement with China, its second largest trading partner, and a country that increasingly plays a more prominent role in the international arena.
Dr. Burton recommends the Government of Canada diversify its engagement with China and directly engage policymakers in the Chinese Government and Communist Party whose decisions have implications for Canada’s interests, rather than focusing their efforts on institutions and channels that are not influential.
“China requires a comprehensive engagement strategy,” says Dr. Burton. “The focus of our engagement should extend beyond formal relationships with the Chinese government through conventional diplomatic channels. It is central to Canada’s interests to energetically and proactively engage China at the central, provincial and local levels.”
Effective and comprehensive engagement strategy in China is vital to Canada’s prosperity, but smarter engagement with China demands a Canadian foreign affairs establishment having the requisite language and cultural skills and creativity in policy implementation.
“Nearly all Canadian diplomats posted in China lack any serious Chinese language skills. For example, most cannot read the local daily newspaper or understand the nightly news on television. Also, the current rotation system of diplomatic postings results in personnel spending only three years in China before being transferred elsewhere,” points out Dr. Burton.“ These circumstances seriously inhibit trade promotion at the time when Canada continues to lose market share in China.”
Canada’s policy towards China is in fact so out of date that it is now of little interest to the Chinese, Dr. Burton added. In his recommendations, Dr. Burton outlines several strategies: engagement with a wider variety of actors in official China that includes the Communist Party, developing a program of incentives for civil servants with Chinese language skills to encourage them to focus their careers on China-related work, clearly articulating Canada’s strategy for improving and promoting access to the Chinese market for Canadian business, as well as facing China with maturity, enthusiasm, energy and creativity.
Dr. Charles Burton is one of four respected academics chosen earlier this year by the CIC to contribute new perspectives in vital areas of Canadian foreign policy leading to further discussion and debate.
For more information about this paper or the CIC Fellows, please visit: www.canadianinternationalcouncil.org
MEDIA CONTACT:
Neve Peric
Director of Media Relations
Tel: (519) 885-2444, ext. 390
Mobile: (519) 590-2626
nperic@canadianinternationalcouncil.org
The Canadian International Council (CIC) is a non-partisan, nationwide council established to strengthen Canada’s role in international affairs. With 13 branches nationwide, part of the CIIA national branch network, CIC seeks to advance research, discussion and debate on international issues by supporting a Canadian foreign policy network that crosses academic disciplines, policy areas, and economic sectors. The CIC features a privately funded fellowship program, supported by a network of issue-specific working groups. Carefully selected CIC fellows focus on important foreign policy issues, working out of universities and research institutions across the country. The CIC was founded in 2007 by Jim Balsillie, co-CEO of RIM (Research In Motion).
-30-
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Le-Conseil-International-Du-Canada-953759.html
Le Conseil international du Canada
L'approche du Canada à l'égard de la Chine est franchement inadéquate
Les diplomates canadiens sont mal préparés à travailler en Chine et maîtrisent insuffisamment la langue du pays
TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - 24 fév. 2009) - Depuis plus d'une décennie, la politique étrangère du Canada à l'égard de la Chine a cessé de répondre aux attentes établies selon de nombreux critères, soutient une étude publiée aujourd'hui par le Conseil international du Canada (CIC).
Dans cette étude intitulée A Reassessment of Canada's Interests in China and Options for Renewal of Canada's China Policy, Charles Burton examine notre stratégie actuelle à l'endroit de la Chine et juge qu'elle est moins adaptée que jamais à la conjoncture chinoise et à la défense des intérêts canadiens dans ce pays.
Associé de recherche du CIC et politologue à l'Université Brock, Charles Burton a été détaché à deux reprises auprès de l'ambassade du Canada à Pékin. Selon lui, la prospérité de notre pays dans l'environnement commercial mondial sera menacée tant que nous ne raffermirons pas nos liens avec la Chine, deuxième partenaire commercial du Canada et pays de plus en plus dominant sur l'échiquier international.
Plutôt que de centrer nos efforts sur les institutions et réseaux de moindre influence, M. Burton recommande au gouvernement canadien de diversifier ses engagements avec la Chine et de nouer des liens directs avec les stratèges du gouvernement et du Parti communiste chinois qui exercent une réelle influence sur les dossiers liés aux intérêts canadiens.
"Nous devons adopter face à la Chine une stratégie d'engagement globale qui déborde le cadre des relations officielles entretenues dans les réseaux diplomatiques traditionnels, précise-t-il. Il est d'une importance capitale pour nos intérêts de cultiver des liens fructueux et dynamiques avec les autorités centrales, provinciales et locales de la Chine."
Pour appliquer intelligemment cette stratégie globale indispensable à notre prospérité, le personnel canadien des affaires étrangères doit posséder les aptitudes linguistiques et culturelles nécessaires à sa mise en oeuvre créative.
"Très peu de diplomates canadiens affectés en Chine ont une connaissance suffisante de la langue chinoise, déplore le professeur Burton. Par exemple, la plupart ne peuvent lire les quotidiens locaux ni comprendre les informations télévisées. De plus, notre système de rotation des affectations diplomatiques prévoit le transfert de nos effectifs après seulement trois années de présence en Chine. Ce qui restreint énormément nos efforts de promotion commerciale, alors même que le Canada perd chaque jour des parts du marché chinois."
En fait, la politique canadienne est si obsolète qu'elle suscite aujourd'hui très peu d'intérêt chez les Chinois, observe M. Burton. Parmi ses recommandations, il propos notamment l'adoption des mesures suivantes : élargissement de l'engagement canadien à un vaste éventail de décideurs chinois, y compris au sein du Parti communiste ; élaboration d'un programme d'incitations destiné aux fonctionnaires canadiens qui maîtrisent la langue chinoise afin de les encourager à centrer leur carrière sur les dossiers relatifs à la Chine ; énonciation claire d'une stratégie favorisant l'accès des entreprises canadiennes au marché chinois ; et adoption à l'égard de la Chine d'une approche réfléchie, enthousiaste, dynamique et créative.
Charles Burton est l'un des quatre universitaires de premier plan à qui le CIC a proposé en 2008 de définir de nouvelles perspectives dans les domaines clés de la politique étrangère du Canada en vue d'enrichir le débat public.
Pour de plus amples renseignements sur cette étude et les associés de recherche du CIC, prière de visiter le www.canadianinternationalcouncil.org.
Le Conseil international du Canada (CIC) est un organisme national non partisan créé en vue de renforcer le rôle du Canada dans les affaires internationales. Totalisant au pays 13 sections intégrées au réseau national de l'ICAI, le CIC vise à favoriser la recherche, le dialogue et le débat sur les grands enjeux mondiaux en appuyant un réseau d'étude de la politique étrangère canadienne qui traverse les disciplines, orientations politiques et secteurs économiques. Le CIC a créé un programme de bourses de recherche financé par le secteur privé et soutenu par un réseau de groupes de travail spécialisés. Rigoureusement sélectionnés, ses membres se consacrent à d'importantes questions de politique étrangère en lien avec des universités et des établissements de recherche de tout le pays. Le CIC a été fondé en 2007 par Jim Balsillie, coprésident et chef de la direction de RIM (Research In Motion).
For more information, please contact
RENSEIGNEMENTS :Le Conseil international du Canada (CIC)
Neve Peric, Relations avec les médias
(519) 885-2444, poste 390
Courriel : nperic@canadianinternationalcouncil.org
Site Web : www.canadianinternationalcouncil.org
A Reassessment of Canada’s Interests in China and Options for Renewal of Canada’s China Policy
Download Charles Burton's A Reassessment of Canada’s Interests in China and Options for Renewal of Canada’s China Policy
Executive Summary
- Because Canada is continuing to lose market share in China, the Government of Canada should clearly articulate its strategy for improving and promoting access to the Chinese market for Canadian business. This strategy should be focused on the distinctive characteristics of the Chinese market and business culture, and Canada’s comparative advantage in that market vis-à-vis our competitors. Trade officials should be deployed with much better pro-active coordination between the Federal Trade Commissioners Service, provincial government trade promotions agencies, the Export Development Corporation and the Canada-China Business Council.
- The Government of Canada should phase out the CIDA program in China. Instead, Canada should engage in good governance, democratic development and human rights programming in China through the arms-length Canada Foundation for Democracy proposed by the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. Stakeholder groups in Canada based on ethnic ties to China or with mandates to promote human rights in China should be better deployed to collaborate with Government to achieve the aims of the Canada Foundation for Democracy in its China programming. In addition, the Canadian Government and private sector should jointly engage in environmental sustainability programming though the Trade Section of the Canadian Embassy to China.
- The Government should reform its human resources procedures to ensure assignment of personnel with the requisite qualifications to undertake China-related positions. The effectiveness of the divisions of DFAIT, CSIS and DND responsible for Canada’s relations with China is severely inhibited due to allocation of personnel without China-specific expertise to positions that demand this expertise. This demands requiring that civil servants assigned to certain China-related positions demonstrate appropriate Chinese language skills as measured by standardized Chinese language testing as a prerequisite to deployment. Personnel who have acquired Chinaspecific expertise should be significantly rewarded through an incentives scheme designed to encourage Canadian civil servants to undertake careers with a sustained China focus.
- The Government of Canada should diversify its engagement of China. Canada should be directly engaging policymakers in the Chinese Government and Communist Party whose decisions have implications for Canada’s interests in China on an ongoing basis. The current focus on the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation offices of Chinese line ministries should be expanded to a more comprehensive engagement of policymaking and decision making agencies in the Chinese system.
- Reporting on China by DFAIT and the Intelligence Assessment Staff of the Privy Council Office as well as the Communications Security Establishment Canada and the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service should be refocused away from general assessments of Chinese affairs and should instead focus reporting on practical matters directly related to Canada’s interests. The relevance to Canada and quality of these reports should be subject to periodic external review to ensure that they are fulfilling the strategic mandate of these agencies.
- The Government of Canada should pursue engagement of Chinese ministries on an ongoing basis at Director-General to Director-General and Assistant Deputy Minister to Assistant Deputy Minister level. “Strategic Partnership” at the Deputy-Minister level is not feasible due to economic asymmetry between Canada and China. Due to power asymmetry between Canada and China, high-level Canadian Government engagement of the Government of China on political and social issues through “quiet diplomacy” such as the Canada-China Bilateral Human Rights Dialogue has not proven effective. While it is certainly in the Canadian interest to raise human rights concerns in all Canadian Government interactions with Chinese leaders, more focused and targeted programming to encourage enhanced Chinese compliance with its commitments to the UN Human Rights Covenants should replace the previous moribund Human Rights Dialogue approach.
- The Government of Canada should strengthen the China-specific expertise of CSIS counter-espionage officers. Canada should also be more proactive in responding to Canadians of Chinese origin, and to Chinese nationals A Reassessment of Canada’s Interests in China and Options for Renewal of Canada’s China Policy temporarily resident in Canada, including ethnic Tibetans, Uyghurs and Mongolians who complain of harassment and intimidation by Chinese security agents and Chinese diplomats in Canada.
- The Government of Canada should solicit Tibetan, Uyghur and Mongolian diaspora communities’ views, as well the views of their co-nationals still living in China, on the design and implications of Canadian Government supported programming in their native lands. This consultation will better ensure that the Government is fully attuned to ethnic sensitivities in its China-focused programming. Such consultation would not imply that the Government of Canada endorses Tibetan, Uyghur and Mongolian independentist claims to rightful sovereignty over these territories, nor that the Canadian Government intends to challenge the legitimacy of Chinese rule in these areas.
- The proportion of Chinese citizens working as support staff in the Consular sections of the Canadian Embassy and Consulates in China should be reduced. There should be corresponding augmentation of numbers of Canadabased staff with Chinese language skills and knowledge of Chinese police, prison, security agencies and the related Chinese Communist Party institutions.
Wednesday, February 04, 2009
Link to NGO Coalition Letter to Prime Minister Harper about Guantanamo Uyghurs and Huseyin Celil
http://web.ncf.ca/aq159/NGO%20Coalition%20Letter%20on%20Uyghurs%20and%20H%20Celil.pdf
For a report that indicates that the Chinese Government does not want Canada to accept any of the Uyghurs currently in prison at Guantanamo click here.
Friday, January 23, 2009
Comments on China's National Report Submitted to the UN Human Rights Council on 10 November 2008
Other relevant documents here: http://www.upr-info.org/Documents-for-the-review,459.html
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Economic Explanation for Why Strikes By Teaching Assistants Go On Too Long
The TAs on the other hand will not likely be suffering much economic loss in the end. Usually TAs are paid by the term so their contracts are for 8 months out of 12. The other 4 months they live off what they were paid for the previous 8. So seeing as the winter term will be extended into the spring to make up two 12-week periods of classes followed by exams, the TAs only suffer a financial loss if the strike extends beyond 16 weeks.
The professors presumably will get 100% of their annual salary as they are simply shifting their non-teaching work to the strike period.
So it is mostly the students who suffer from a prolonged strike.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Comment on the January 19 Spring Festival Gala 2009 Show at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa
Friday, January 09, 2009
Announcement of Chinese Spring Festival Show at National Arts Centre in Ottawa January 16 for which I will be Co-MC
East Meets West
Ancient and Modern China Combine to Celebrate the Chinese New Year
at the National Arts Centre, Ottawa
Friday, January 16 at 8:00 p.m.
Northern China culture will also be illustrated by the distinctive throat singing talent of Black Steed, a quintet Mongolian male singing group that also demonstrates traditional Mongolian musical instruments.
Maestro of China National Peking Opera House will perform the episode from the well known Monkey King story, the Journey to the West. Two renowned visual artists demonstrate for the audience the true sense of Chinese culture by the on-stage painting and calligraphy in the background of traditional Chinese music instrument playing.
International award winning acrobats, dancers, singers and musicians make up the full cast of this truly unique cultural experience designed for the whole family. This feast of artistry reflects the highest quality of Chinese performing arts on the world stage today. It will surely be one of the major cultural attractions in the National Capital Region in 2009.
Tickets for the Spring Festival Gala 2009 are available from the NAC Box Office, Ticketmaster and local Chinese community outlets. Prices range from $20.00 to $80 for regular tickets. www.springfestivalgala.ca
Thursday, January 08, 2009
Charter 08 Arrests
China Meetings and the Chatham House Rule
These days well night every academic conference on China or NGO "consultations" with the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs are held under the "Chatham House Rule"
This rule is explained on the Chatham website (http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/about/chathamhouserule/) like this:
"The Chatham House Rule reads as follows:
'When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.'
The world-famous Chatham House Rule may be invoked at meetings to encourage openness and the sharing of information."
But I wonder why participants in meetings about China find it necessary to conceal their identities when stating an opinion on or interpretation of contemporary Chinese politics? What are we afraid of? Isn't openness and transparency what we ask of our Chinese counterparts? Why do we not ask it of ourselves?
Worry about Robert Fowler, Louis Guay and Huseyin Celil
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
I am Speaking at National Library in Ottawa on January 15 at 7:30pm
The Reforms of Deng Xiaoping
by Professor Charles Burton
of Brock University
Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 7:30 p.m.
Library and Archives Canada, Room 156
395 Wellington Street, Ottawa
All are welcome.*
In the context of the 30th anniversary year of the opening and reform policies of the new China, Professor Burton will review Chinese politics and economics prior to reform and opening up. He will take us through the momentous events of 1976, “The Year of the Dragon” starting with the April 5, 1976 movement (the Tiananmen people’s homage to the recently deceased Zhou Enlai), the consolidation of power by Mao’s political heir Hua Guofeng, his rivalry with Deng Xiaoping, and the October purge of the "Gang of Four". He will look at the factors accounting for Deng Xiaoping's rise to power and show why Deng's strategy to stimulate the economy while ensuring political and social stability proved very successful. He will then take us through the politics and economics in China after Deng Xiaoping's 1992 "Southern Tour" and the impact of Communist party leaders Zhao Ziyang, Hu Yaobang, Jiang Zemin on the reform policies, leading to the current President Hu Jintao's stamp of approval on Deng Xiaoping's legacy after 30 years of revolution 1949-1979 and 30 years of opening and reform from 1979-2009: What has been gained and what has been lost?
Dr. Burton has been Associate Professor of Political Science at Brock University since 1989. Since 1991 he has been borrowed twice from Brock by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade to work in the Canadian Embassy in Beijing from 1991 to 93 and most recently from 1998 until 2000, as Counsellor for Political Affairs.
Dr. Burton received a Ph.D. from the University of Toronto in 1987 after studies at Cambridge University. He also spent three years at Fudan University in Shanghai in the late 1970s. His first job was with the Communications Security Establishment in the Department of National Defence in Ottawa. He is author and editor of books and articles about China and North Korea, his major fields of research and policy advice.
*********
As is our custom, tea and refreshments will be served. There will be a charge of $5 for non-CCFS members. The CCFS-Ottawa Annual Membership is $20 for individuals, $25 for a family and $12 for students.
For further information about the Society or this event, call L. Merklinger at 819-777-8434 or go to www.fccfa.ca/Ottawa. Membership forms are available at this website.
Friday, January 02, 2009
Condoleezza Rice to visit China Jan 7-8
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Geoff York's Final Comments from Beijing on Chinese MFA
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
English translation of Charter 08 Now Available
loose, informal, and open association of people…… united by the will to strive individually and collectively for respect for human and civil rights in our country and throughout the world.
The Chinese document calls not for ameliorative reform of the current political system but for an end to some of its essential features, including one-party rule, and their replacement with a system based on human rights and democracy.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
China Refuses to Answer Questions from UN Panel on Torture Allegations
Friday, November 07, 2008
China Should Ensure that its Human Rights "National Action Plan" Amounts to More than a Publicity Stunt
作者:CHRD 文章来源:CHRD 点击数:25 更新时间:2008-11-7 11:07:10
China Should Ensure that its "National Action Plan" Amounts to More than a Publicity Stunt
(Chinese Human Rights Defenders, November 7, 2008) –The Chinese government announced on November 4 that it is to draft its first "national action plan to protect human rights". Although CHRD welcomes the initiative, it is concerned that the plan will fall short of its stated objective of protecting human rights due to the following reasons:
The plan, as outlined thus far, is vague. It lacks details such as a concrete timetable for implementation of the plan or precisely the kind of actions that it will involve.
It is unclear why the State Council Information Office (responsible for publicizing official information domestically and promoting the Chinese government abroad) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (responsible for foreign relations) will be heading the government panel that drafts the plan.
The government panel will be advised by "ten human rights experts from key universities and academic institutions" and "NGOs". CHRD is concerned that these experts and organizations will only be those carefully hand-picked and controlled by the government. CHRD is particularly concerned that the drafting process excludes consultation with the wider public, especially independent human rights activists and genuinely independent NGOs.
The facts that the plan as currently outlined is vague and that its drafting is to be led by government agencies involved in promoting China's image abroad and advised by individuals who lack independence raise the suspicion that Chinese government has initiated the plan not to promote human rights but to placate the international community at a time when China is being reviewed by the UN Committee Against Torture (November 7 and 10) and will soon be reviewed by the Human Rights Council in its Universal Periodic Review mechanism in February 2009.
CHRD believes that a concrete national action plan could genuinely and effectively promote human rights if:
the Chinese government invites members of the public and civil society, especially independent human rights activists and groups, to participate in the drafting process;
the Chinese government makes a draft of this plan available to the public, involves it in a thorough process of consultation, and incorporates the public's opinion into the finalized plan;
the drafting panel is headed by the National People's Congress (NPC), the legislative body that is vested with the power to make laws that could effectively protect human rights;
the plan includes the establishment of a national human rights body, such as an independent National Commission on Human Rights, as exists in many other countries, to ensure that the plan will be implemented and effectively monitored; and
the plan addresses, among other areas of concern, the following five requests CHRD has made to the Chinese government and asked the UN Human Rights Council to consider during its Universal Periodic Review of China in February 2009:
(1) Take effective measures to implement the Convention against Torture.
(2) Abolish all systems of arbitrary detention.
(3) End the criminalization of freedom of speech and of the press.
(4) Cease Party and government control of the judiciary.
(5) Honor its commitment to protect human rights defenders.